Legal Opinion

Wickstrom v. North Idaho College

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1986No. 16202PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*451HUNTLEY, Justice.

This proceeding arises from the trial court’s grant of respondent’s motion for summary judgment on grounds that appellants’ claims against North Idaho College and one of its instructors, Charles D. Chastain, were tort claims barred by applicable provisions of the Idaho Tort Claims Act. We are called upon to decide whether, as found by the trial court, appellants’ claims lay in tort and were, consequently, barred by provisions of the Idaho Tort Claims Act, or whether such claims also state a possible cause of action in contract.

Russell Wickstrom, Kenneth Hash, Bruce Bennett…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guglielmi v. Spelling-Goldberg ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Marquez v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Peretti v. State of Mont.District Court, D. Montana · 1979
  5. Huff v. UhlIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kevin Ross v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Hendricks v. Clemson UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Hines v. HinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API