Legal Opinion

Jones v. Watson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1977No. 12176PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Milford and Hazel Jones, plaintiffs-respondents, filed suit against Albert and Madeline Watson, defendants-appellants, alleging that they are holders of a promissory note executed by the Watsons, and that the Watsons failed to make payments on the note when due. The Jones sought judgment for the amount of the note, plus interest and attorney’s fees. After trial, the court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants have perfected this appeal, and we affirm.

Plaintiffs are the holders of a $10,000 promissory note executed by defendants on January 26, 1967. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Black Canyon Racquetball Club, Inc. v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hines v. HinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Duffin v. Idaho Crop Improvement Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API