Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Preston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1978No. 12295PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Plaintiff appellant Smith was injured and his automobile damaged in an accident in Preston, Idaho. Smith sued defendant respondent City of Preston claiming that the city’s failure to properly maintain a stop sign was the cause of the accident. Smith appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the city, arguing that the district court erred (1) in allowing the city to amend its answer, and (2) in concluding that Smith had failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Idaho Tort Claims Act. I.C. §§ 6-901 to -928.

I

The accident occurred on September 27, 1973. In a letter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. DeSa v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  4. Bozaich v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Van v. Portneuf Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cougar Bay Co., Inc. v. BristolIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Farber v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. W.L. Scott, Inc. v. Madras Aerotech, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API