Legal Opinion

Chambers v. McCollum

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1928No. 5044PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

The questions raised on this appeal involve, in certain designated particulars hereinafter pointed out, the constitutionality of the Idaho Forestry Law (Sess. Laws 1925, chap. 150, pp. 265-286.) From the allegations contained in the complaint it appears, substantially, that appellant is the owner of eighty acres of timber land situated in the Clearwater forest protective district in Clearwater county, and that a charge against his land of $8.91 has been levied under and by virtue of the Forestry Law, which sum will be made a lien on his land and collected as taxes are collected, with a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Light v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Smallwood v. JeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Howard v. MissmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Newland v. ChildIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API