Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1942No. Civ. 13440PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of respondents after the trial court entered a judgment denying petitioner’s application for a writ of mandate requiring respondents to make an order allowing her a pension because of the death of her husband, a police officer of defendant city, petitioner appeals.

The essential facts are:

November 1, 1939, at approximately 5 :30 p. m. petitioner’s husband, a police officer of the city of Los Angeles, left the central police station in a Ford automobile owned by defendant city apparently en route home. At approximately 6:10 p. m. of the same day while driving in an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CapalboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. State of Arizona v. DuguidArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Kuroske v. Ætna Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. MacIntyre v. Retirement Board of SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Nazareno v. UrieAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Patricia Bach, Etc. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API