Legal Opinion
Kuroske v. Ætna Life Insurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1940PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The policy in question was a so-called “special automobile accident policy,” under the terms of which the liability of the defendant was limited. The policy provided, in part, as follows :
“The insurance under this policy shall not cover accident, injury, death, disability or other loss caused directly or indirectly, wholly or partly, (1) by disease in any form, (2) by gas poisoning or asphyxiation, or (3) by war or any act of war; or sustained by the insured . . . (7) while under the influence oí any intoxicant or narcotic.”
The policy was issued in this state and must be construed as a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- State of Arizona v. DuguidArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Badger v. Janesville Cotton MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Schulz v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Zenner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Lebel v. SwincickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Commonwealth v. CapalboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- People v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Lawrence v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.