Legal Opinion
People v. Adams
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1976No. Crim 15259PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, P. J.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the failure of the breath test to strictly comply with the calibration procedure of Administrative Code section 1221.4, subdivision (b)1 rendered the results of the test .inadmissible in evidence against appellants, who were each charged with violation of Vehicle Code section 23102, subdivision (a). We conclude that it did not.
Breath tests to determine blood alcohol concentration have long been recognized by decisional law as scientifically valid in this state and elsewhere. (People v. Sudduth, 65 Cal.2d 543, 546 [55…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Seaboard Acceptance Corp. v. ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. WallinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- City of Cincinnati v. SandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Imachi v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.