Legal Opinion

Nazareno v. Urie

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1981No. 4807PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Plaintiff Felicidad Nazareno appeals from an adverse jury verdict, contending that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on negligence per se principles. We reverse.

Nazareno sued the owners of a Kodiak bar, Sid and Martin Urie, for damages resulting from her collision with a bar patron on the bar’s dance floor. Three witnesses testified to the circumstances surrounding her injury. Nazareno and a friend, Ruby Waltrip, both stated they had noticed a tall, heavyset man, later identified as Dennis Welch, who was talking very loudly, and who had “a really red…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Elder v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Brigance v. Velvet Dove Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738, Inc. v. ClaywellKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API