Wagner v. Town of Conover
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabKsoN, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of • all the evidence defendant made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. In overruling these motions in the court below, we can see no error.
It is well settled in this jurisdiction that plaintiff can recover of a municipality for sewer disposal causing damage. In Donnell v. Greensboro, 164 N. C., at p. 334, citing numerous authorities, is the following: “The decisions of this State are in approval of the principle that the owner can recover such damage for a wrong of this character, and that the right…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Metz v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Williams v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Cook v. Town of MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Moses v. Town of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gray v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- McKinney v. DeneenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Clinard v. Town of KernersvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Anderson v. Town of WaynesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Lightner v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.