Legal Opinion

Lightner v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaRicsoN, J.

The controversy succinctly is to the effect: (1) That defendant is emptying its sewage into Walnut Creek and started doing so early in 1890. (2) In 1910, the city built an impounding reservoir on Walnut Creek above the reservoir at tbe pumping station, and in 1923 another impounding reservoir called Lake Johnson was built still further up Walnut Creek, and extracted the natural flow of water from Walnut Creek and turned it back in filth, through the sewer system. (3) The waterworks and sewer system were extended, revised and the outfall in Walnut Creek enlarged in 1922-23. (4) John Bray, who…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Webb v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Cook v. Town of MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Gray v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Anderson v. Town of WaynesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. DolbowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Ivester v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Bishop v. ReinholdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API