Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Deneen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1950No. 162PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Under the decisions of this Court, there is no mis-joinder of parties and causes of action. Lineberger v. Gastonia, 196 N.C. 445, 146 S.E. 79; Stowe v. Gastonia, ante, 157.

Plaintiffs do not allege merely that defendants, in getting out and washing the products of mica mines, have allowed waste, water and sediment to run off into the natural course of South Toe River. They allege that defendants, in the operation of their plants, pumped “a stream of water through pipes, hose and nozzles and boring into the earth and cutting loose thousands of tons of earth and washing it down into the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. Town of MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Lineberger v. . GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Wagner v. Town of ConoverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. McCutchen v. McCutchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Hunt v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Quick v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API