Legal Opinion
O'Hara v. Harman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 15, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal by the plaintiff, Daniel O’Hara, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, C. Wesley Harman, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Hew York on the 27th day of June, 1896, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term, dismissing his complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J.:
The action was brought for an accounting under an agreement, which is as follows:
“ Whereas, Daniel O’Hara, of Waltham, Massachusetts, and Horace G. Skidmore and 0. Wesley Harman, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, have this day made mutual transfers of certain improvements in watch cases, etc., for which they have made applications -for letters patent of the United States; and, whereas, the said parties have agreed to make, sell and use and otherwise dispose of said patents and patented improvements (and all improvements in' watches, watch cases and watch attachments that any one or more…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Wilcox v. PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Chalmers v. Eaton Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Replogle v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.