Lanning v. Osborne
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The bill in this case alleges, among other things, that the San Diego Hand & Town Company, of which the complainant is the duly appointed and qualified receiver, is a corporation duly organized and exisnng under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Kansas, and at the times mentioned in the bill was doing business in the state of California; that during all the limes mentioned the company was, and still is, the owner of valuable water, water rights, reservoirs, and of a pipe system for furnishing water to consumers for domestic, irriga lion, and other purposes, and of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wyatt v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boise City Irr. & Land Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Prosole v. Steamboat Canal Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Gordon v. DoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Lanning v. OsborneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
- State v. Laramie Rivers Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.