Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Eighteenth District Court, County of San Bernardino. McNeaLY, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
The purposes for which defendant was incorporated, as set forth in its articles, were : “ To buy, own, occupy, improve, and sell or otherwise dispose of any lands and real estate in the State of California, and any personal property; to acquire and hold .any water rights and privileges, and to use and dispose of the same; to conduct and maintain ditches and canals, and all easements and rights appertaining thereto, for the purpose of taking and conveying water for irrigation, milling, manufacturing, or other purposes; to make, purchase, maintain, hold, and use all dams,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. Hartford & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- Fremont v. CrippenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by38 opinions
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Star Publishing Co. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.