Legal Opinion

Lanning v. Osborne

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California

Decided March 22, 1897No. Nos. 671 and 716PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The bill in this case, to which there are a large number of defendants, was filed January 6, 1896. It alleges, among other things: That on the áth day of September, 1895, the complainant was, by an order and decree of the circuit court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts, duly made and entered, appointed receiver of all of the property of the San Diego Land & Town Company, with full power to take possession of and manage, operate, and control the same, including the plant and water system in the bill mentioned; and that by an order of this court, duly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. French v. HaySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Dietzsch v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. WertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Southern Exp. Co. v. Mayor of EnsleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1902
  4. United States v. InabaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1923
  5. Jewel Tea Co. v. Lee's SummitDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API