Prosole v. Steamboat Canal Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Cole L. Harwood, Judge. Action by Palmira Prosole and another against the Steamboat Canal Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
*156By the Court,
McCarran, J.:
The appellant company, being the owner of the Steamboat Canal, has for many years been engaged in the business of diverting water from the Truckee River and delivering the same to and upon the lands under that canal for a valuable consideration. It is admitted that for many years last past and until the year 1909 the defendant by means of its canal conveyed to and upon the lands of the respondents, and delivered to the respondents, fifty inches of water for a valuable consideration, to wit, the sum of $6 per annum for each inch of water so conveyed and delivered. It…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901
- Farmers' Co-operative Ditch Co. v. Riverside Irrigation District, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Lanning v. OsborneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896
- People ex rel. Standart v. Farmers High Line Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1980
- State v. MorrosNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Steptoe Live Stock Co. v. GulleyNevada Supreme Court · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.