Legal Opinion

Boise City Irr. & Land Co. v. Clark

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1904No. 999PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Central Division of the District of Idaho.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant is a New Jersey corporation, and brought the present suit in the court below against the county commissioners of Ada county, Idaho, sitting as a board of water commissioners, to obtain a decree annulling an order made by the commission fixing a maximum rate to be charged by the complainant for water delivered from its canal system to consumers thereof for the irrigating season of the year 1901. The provisions of the Constitution and statutes of the state of Idaho bearing upon the question are as follows:

Section 1 of article 15 of the state Constitution…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Foster v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Walling v. Mutual Wholesale Food & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. Francis W. Friend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Walling v. Haile Gold Mines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API