Legal Opinion

State v. Laramie Rivers Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1943No. 2224PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

This is an action by 24 plaintiffs acting on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against the Pioneer Canal Company and the Laramie Rivers Company for mismanagement in connection with two different systems of irrigation, namely, that of the Pioneer Canal and the Lake Hattie Reservoir, for an injunction, for the appointment of a receiver, and other equitable relief. The record shows the following facts:

The Pioneer Canal was constructed by the Pioneer Canal Company. The water is derived from the Big Laramie River, in Albany County, Wyoming. The Canal Company was…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. White v. Wheatland Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Blankenship v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re RomerWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Wheatland Irrigation District v. Pioneer Canal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Anita Ditch Company v. TurnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API