Legal Opinion
Dorris v. Alturas School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 1914No. Civ. No. 1217PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are stated in thé opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was to recover the value of certain materials furnished by plaintiff to the contractor to be used in the construction of a school building for the defendant district. There is no controversy as to the facts, and the decisive question is whether under the findings plaintiff is entitled to judgment. The contract for the building was executed on June 6, 1911, and it is set out in the answer herein. It provided that the contractor, Pearson, “shall and will for the consideration hereinafter mentioned, on or before the fifteenth day of November, 1911, well and sufficiently construct,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Suisun Lumber Co. v. Fairfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Butler v. Ng ChungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Denison v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winick Corp. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Harsco Corp. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Pittsburg Unified School District v. S.J. Amoroso Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- East Quincy Services District v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Cal-Pac. Materials Co. v. Redondo Beach City Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.