Suisun Lumber Co. v. Fairfield School District
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County, and from an order denying a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendant, through its board of trustees, entered into a written contract with one C. C. Foy, on the fourth day of January, 1908, for the construction of a grammar school building, for the sum of $16,000 in cash and the old school building at the agreed value of $1,000. Under the stipulations of the .contract said building was to be completed ■by the first day of August, 1908.
The plaintiff, prior to the twenty-first day of September, 1908, furnished the said Foy certain materials which, accord ing to the averments of the complaint, “were to be used and were used in the construction of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lillis v. Emigrant Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Williams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Kronkright v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Helpling v. HelplingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.