Denison v. Burrell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment rendered against defendants in an action for the foreclosure of a materialman's lien. The facts were stipulated, and upon them the court rendererd the judgment complained of. The stipulation of facts is under agreement of the parties made a part of the judgment-roll, and may here he considered as the findings upon which the judgment was based. (Muller v. Rowell, 110 Cal. 318.)
Defendant Metcalf had entered into a contract with defendant Burrell whereby he agreed to erect a frame cottage for the latter. The price was the sum of seven hundred and sixty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Golden Gate Lumber Co. v. SahrbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Muller v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wiggins v. BridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Dunlop v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dorris v. Alturas School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- O'Brien v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Bailey Ornamental Iron Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Southern California Lumber Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Great Western Sugar Co. v. F. H. Gilcrest Lumber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.