Legal Opinion
Harsco Corp. v. Department of Public Works
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 1971No. Civ. 11558PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
J. —■ From that portion of the judgment awarding plaintiff $7,012.46 as against defendant Department of Public Works (hereinafter Department), Department appeals.
The Facts
The essential facts, are not in dispute. In October 1968, the Department entered into a written contract with defendant Ashby Construction Co. (hereinafter Ashby) for the construction of a bridge in Riverside County. Pursuant to Government Code section 4200 (now Civ. Code, § 3247) Ashby filed with the department a labor and material bond executed by United Bonding Insurance Company. Between October 15,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- A-1 Door & Materials Co. v. Fresno Guarantee Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. WeinsveigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. FlanaganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Calhoun v. Huntington Park First Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Rossman Mill & Lumber Co. v. Fullerton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Marriage of WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Holiday Development Co. v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of DunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Pittsburg Unified School District v. S.J. Amoroso Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- East Quincy Services District v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.