Legal Opinion
East Quincy Services District v. General Accident Insurance Co. of America
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 2001No. C033482PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
Nominal plaintiff East Quincy Services District (the District) filed a “Complaint in Intervention” [sic], 1 which interpled General Accident Insurance Company of America (the Surety) and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (the Division) as defendants contesting entitlement to funds the District was holding. The defendants subsequently stipulated to the dismissal of the District from the lawsuit. 2
The gist of the dispute was whether the District should deduct penalties for prevailing wage and overtime violations 3 on its public works project from the balance…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Caron v. AndrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Pittsburg Unified School District v. S.J. Amoroso Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- State Farm General Insurance v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006