United States v. Ortiz
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*324 Opinion of the Court
EVERETT, Chief Judge:
After appellant filed his petition for review, this Court issued a docketing notice which directed the filing of a supplement to the petition on or before March 27, 1987. See Rule 20(e), Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Military Appeals. However, no supplement was filed by that date. Then, on March 30, appellate defense counsel moved to file a supplement out-of-time, noting that the appellate defense counsel who had represented appellant at the Court of Military Review had departed from the Air Force and that “[t]hrough…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SumpterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. RiversCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. MayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.