Legal Opinion

United States v. Sumpter

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 7, 1986No. 54014; ACM 24895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

Appellate defense counsel’s motion to file petition for grant of review out of time refers to “appellant’s previous and inadvertent loss of his petition forms.” Attached to the motion is the petition itself— also signed by appellate defense counsel— which mentions “the inadvertent discarding of his petition forms by appellant” and notes that it is submitted “[a]t the specific request of appellant.” In support, counsel cite United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), which contemplates that appellate defense counsel will present any issues an accused wishes to…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. TamezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. BellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. BridgesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API