Legal Opinion
State v. Young
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 29, 2004No. 0203-43264; A119790PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
In this criminal case, defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for misdemeanor driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. He argues that the trial court erred in concluding that he is not eligible for DUII diversion. We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. In 1998, defendant was charged with the possession of a controlled substance. He participated in a county “Stop” program; by successfully completing drug treatment, he obtained the dismissal of the charge.
Four years later, defendant was charged with DUII. He sought enrollment in DUII diversion, but the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Kerr v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Waggoner v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.