Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. City of Woodburn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2004No. 03C-10020; A123133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff was injured while using a swing at a public park. She initiated this action for negligence against defendant, the owner of the park. Defendant obtained summary judgment dismissing the claim on the ground that defendant is entitled to immunity under the state’s recreational use statute, ORS 105.682. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that the immunity that the statute affords should apply only to undeveloped, rural land in its natural state, not to public parks. Defendant relies on the wording of the statute, which provides for immunity when an injury arises out of the use of “all public and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Neal v. WilkesMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Liberty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Liberty v. State, Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Schlesinger v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API