Legal Opinion

Newell v. Weston

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1998No. 9212-08470; CA A89561PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*373ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendant Weston petitions for an award of attorney fees based on his lease agreement with plaintiff. He contends that he is entitled to fees because he prevailed on plaintiff’s cross-appeal, in which plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to overturn the trial court’s decision that plaintiff could not recover damages from defendant for a breach of the lease. Plaintiff contends that defendant is not entitled to an award of fees, because plaintiff prevailed on the appeal, and, as a result, judgment ultimately will be entered in his favor. We allow defendant’s petition in the amount of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. American Petrofina Co. of Texas v. D & L Oil Supply, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Multnomah County v. SlikerOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Zidell v. Greenway Landing Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Cantua v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Mindful Insights, LLC v. VerifyValid, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API