Newell v. Weston
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*373ARMSTRONG, J.
Defendant Weston petitions for an award of attorney fees based on his lease agreement with plaintiff. He contends that he is entitled to fees because he prevailed on plaintiff’s cross-appeal, in which plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to overturn the trial court’s decision that plaintiff could not recover damages from defendant for a breach of the lease. Plaintiff contends that defendant is not entitled to an award of fees, because plaintiff prevailed on the appeal, and, as a result, judgment ultimately will be entered in his favor. We allow defendant’s petition in the amount of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- American Petrofina Co. of Texas v. D & L Oil Supply, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Multnomah County v. SlikerOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Zidell v. Greenway Landing Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Aguilar v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Cantua v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Mindful Insights, LLC v. VerifyValid, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.