Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Fred Meyer Stores

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 2005No. 03-04253; A124562PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*675LANDAU, P. J.

ORS 656.265(1) requires that a worker give an employer notice of an accident resulting in injury or death. At issue in this case is whether a claimant who orally reported an injury to her employer gave the notice that is required by that statute. The Workers’ Compensation Board held that she did not. We disagree and therefore reverse and remand for reconsideration.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The relevant facts are not in dispute. On December 22,2001, claimant orally advised her supervisor that she had injured her wrist at work the day before. The supervisor then entered the following…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Moody v. Oregon Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. BranamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API