Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 2015No. 120230702; A152515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225, assigning error to the trial court’s failure to acquit him of that crime. As relevant here, the first-degree burglary statute requires the state to establish that a defendant unlawfully entered a “dwelling,” as defined in ORS 164.205(2). In this case, defendant entered a mostly enclosed, roofed area between and connected to a house and a garage. Defendant contends that, because the area that he entered was a separate area outside the house, the state failed to establish that he entered a dwelling. For the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diego Mendoza-Garcia v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. T. L. A. v. VierraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Jose Diaz-Flores v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. SjogrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API