Legal Opinion
Transport Utilitor Sales Co. v. Zwergel
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1924No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiff is an Ohio corporation organized for the purpose of selling automobile trucks and tractors. It secured the services of defendant to act as director of sales. The arrangement for his services was evidenced by a written contract:
“This letter is to confirm our understanding and agreement concerning your employment as director of sales of the Transport Utilitor Sales Company of Toledo, Ohio.
“The period of time for which we engage you in the above capacity is agreed will be for one year dating April 1, 1920, to April 1, 1921.
“In remuneration for your services as director of sales we…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oakes v. Cattaraugus Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Chatterton v. ParrottMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Just v. Township of WiseMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. v. Fitness World of Jackson, Inc. (In Re Dynamic Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- Jesiek v. BanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Vercruysse v. UlagaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924