Legal Opinion

Chatterton v. Parrott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Case made from Kent. Trespass qu. cl. Defendant had judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This appears to be a case made for review in this court after judgment for defendant .in the Kent circuit. The action was trespass qua/re cltmsvm, and the plea was the general issue, with notice that the locus was a private way, properly established as such by the public authorities. The case sets out the pleadings and proceeds to say that— ¶

“ The facts as proved by the evidence are as follows:
“ 1. On and previously to October 28,1878, the plaintiff had been the owner of, and been in possession of the premises mentioned in the declaration.
“ 2. On the 4th day of September, 1878, the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Detmold v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Mutual Aid Society v. BrongerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  2. Broughton v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Fitch v. Board of Auditors of Claims Against Manitou CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hindman v. FriedrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Morgan v. BotsfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API