Just v. Township of Wise
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Isabella. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.
Plaintiff commenced an action of assumpsit against the township and declared upon the common counts with a notice that upon the trial he would give in evidence one accepted highway order a copy of which is set forth. The defense relied upon was that mandamus and not assumpsit was the proper remedy. The cause was tried by the court and a finding of facts made.
*575The court found that in 1872 Patrick Holden entered into a contract with the commissioners of highways, and performed work and labor thereunder amounting to between eight and nine hundred dollars, and that the same was accepted by the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- McBride v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Smith v. CurranMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Waterman-Waterbury Co. v. School District No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- W. J. Fell Co. v. ElswickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Attorney General v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.