Jesiek v. Banfield
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
By stipulation the record and briefs filed in the case of Jesiek, Administrator, v. Ban-field, et al., are to be considered and treated as the record and briefs in the case of Jesiek v. Banfield, et al.
Appellees direct our attention to the fact that the bill of exceptions was settled on November 6, 1930, and, although the printed record was filed shortly thereafter, no further steps were taken by appellant until he filed his brief and praecipe almost eight years later. They suggest that the court dismiss the appeal on its own motion because of appellant’s “unexplained and inexcusable delay.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. Morton Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Thomas v. Morton Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Maurer v. Greening Nursery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Cooley v. Boice BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Transport Utilitor Sales Co. v. ZwergelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitchell v. GrewalMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Falk v. CIVIL SERV. COMM. OF MACOMB CTY.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Holloway v. Ideal Seating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Flanigan v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Carlton v. Parker Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.