Legal Opinion
Vercruysse v. Ulaga
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1924No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
An automobile, owned and driven by defendant, collided on a public highway in Wayne county with a bicycle on which plaintiff was riding. Plaintiff was injured, and had judgment. Defendant brings error.
At about 3:30 p. m., on Friday, November 16, 1923, the jury, of both men and women, retired to consider a verdict and—
“at 5:20 p. m. of that day, said jury were recalled into court in the absence of counsel for the defendant, and asked by the court, as follows:
“ ‘Members of the jury, is there any possibility of your agreeing within the next 30 minutes?’ To which a juror replied, ‘We have agreed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Niedzinski v. CoryellMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Myers v. HindsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Lorenz v. TisdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Transport Utilitor Sales Co. v. ZwergelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Szabo v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Estate of Aaron Reid v. Thomas WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017