Legal Opinion

Vercruysse v. Ulaga

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

An automobile, owned and driven by defendant, collided on a public highway in Wayne county with a bicycle on which plaintiff was riding. Plaintiff was injured, and had judgment. Defendant brings error.

At about 3:30 p. m., on Friday, November 16, 1923, the jury, of both men and women, retired to consider a verdict and—

“at 5:20 p. m. of that day, said jury were recalled into court in the absence of counsel for the defendant, and asked by the court, as follows:
“ ‘Members of the jury, is there any possibility of your agreeing within the next 30 minutes?’ To which a juror replied, ‘We have agreed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Niedzinski v. CoryellMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Myers v. HindsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lorenz v. TisdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Transport Utilitor Sales Co. v. ZwergelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Szabo v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Estate of Aaron Reid v. Thomas WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API