Legal Opinion

United States v. Gomez

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 10, 1983No. CM 440547PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HANSEN, Chief Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of attempted obstruction of justice and premeditated murder in violation of Articles 80 and 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880 and 918, respectively. The case was tried as not capital. Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for life, reduction to Private E-l, and forfeiture of $100.00 per month for twelve months. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Appellant assigns…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1978

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. StanleyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  3. United States v. MarkertNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  4. United States v. PrestoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP OF HAILUNevada Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API