State v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant has presented four propositions of law.
I
Appellant proposes that the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for acquittal and, in the alternative, seeks reduction of the aggravated murder charge to involuntary manslaughter upon the ground that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant “purposely cause[d] the death,” under R. C. 2903.-01(B), of Otto Baum.
R. 0. 2901.22(A) defines “purposely” as follows: “A person acts purposely when it is his specific intention to cause a certain result * * *.” (Emphasis added.)
Although appellant admitted at trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. PerrymanOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. EatonOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. LockettOhio Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.