Legal Opinion

United States v. Augenblick

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 20, 1969No. 45PublishedCited by 528 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Respondents, who had been convicted by courts-martial, brought these suits for back pay. Augenblick, though charged with sodomy, was convicted of a lesser offense, an indecent act, and Juhl was convicted of selling overseas merchandise of an Air Force Exchange. Augenblick was sentenced to dismissal from the service; Juhl was sentenced to reduction in rank, partial forfeiture of pay, and confinement for six months. Each exhausted the remedies available to him 1 and, not having obtained relief, brought suit in the Court of Claims to recover back pay, 2 on the ground that the court-martial…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by528 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

523 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API