United States v. Augenblick
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Respondents, who had been convicted by courts-martial, brought these suits for back pay. Augenblick, though charged with sodomy, was convicted of a lesser offense, an indecent act, and Juhl was convicted of selling overseas merchandise of an Air Force Exchange. Augenblick was sentenced to dismissal from the service; Juhl was sentenced to reduction in rank, partial forfeiture of pay, and confinement for six months. Each exhausted the remedies available to him 1 and, not having obtained relief, brought suit in the Court of Claims to recover back pay, 2 on the ground that the court-martial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by528 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
523 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.