Legal Opinion
United States v. Dansker
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 2, 1976No. Nos. 75-1685 to 75-1692PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
The defendants Dansker, Haymes, Orenstein, Diaco, Valentine, Valentine Electric, and Investors Funding Corporation were convicted under a three count indictment charging them with conspiracy to violate the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952, and with substantive violations of the statute. Count I alleged that they had conspired to utilize the facilities of interstate commerce to bribe Burt Ross, the mayor of Fort Lee, New Jersey, and the defendant Nathan Se-rota, vice-chairman of the Fort Lee Parking Authority, in order to gain zoning variances and other…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Francis P. Long, A/K/A "Red", John Hackett, A/K/A "Jack"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.