Legal Opinion

State v. Kendall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 24, 1989No. C87-02-30946 CA A48220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

773 P.2d 1362 (1989)

96 Or.App. 735

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Tamlane KENDALL, Appellant.

C87-02-30946; CA A48220.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 30, 1989.

Decided May 24, 1989.

J. Marvin Kuhn, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

2Per curiam

In a trial to the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. SmayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API