Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2006No. 010634545; A118915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case. 204 Or App 109, 129 P3d 212 (2006). In our initial opinion, we held that the imposition of dangerous offender sentences under ORS 161.725 without submitting the statutory requisites to a jury for determination was error apparent on the face of record in violation of defendant’s rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We therefore remanded for resentencing. In its petition for reconsideration, the state urges that our reasoning in State v. Warren, 195 Or App 656, 98 P3d 1129…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. VegaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. FenlonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API