Legal Opinion

State v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 1989No. C 87-12-37726; CA A49169PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction after a trial to the court for operating a motor vehicle in violation of an habitual offender order, ORS 811.165, felony driving while suspended. ORS 811.175, and driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010. He asserts that his conviction is void, because there is no written waiver of a jury trial. We reverse and remand.

Consent to be tried without a jury requires an express written waiver under both Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 136.001. The state concedes that defendant gave neither a written nor an oral waiver.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CordrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. WiikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. TaxonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API