Legal Opinion

State v. Huntley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1992No. 90-CR-0071-15; CA A65668PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while suspended, ORS 811.175, contending that it should be reversed because the trial court record does not contain a written waiver of jury trial.

Immediately before trial began, the court said:

“Be seated. Okay. This is State versus Huntley.
“I understand you are waiving jury. Do you have a written waiver?
“[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Unfortunately not, Your Honor. I can have one to you over the noon lunch break. I can get one from Mr. Powers’ office. My — that’s my error.
“THE COURT: Okay.”

There is no written jury trial waiver in the record.

The state argues…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. NaughtenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. CordrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LemonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. TaxonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API