Legal Opinion

State v. Crain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 9804-33425; A108785PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for, among other crimes, rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375. His sole assignment of error on appeal is that, under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as applied in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), the trial court erred in sentencing him as a dangerous offender under ORS 161.725(1)(a) 1 based on facts not pleaded in the indictment or proved to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. The state responds that defendant failed to preserve that claim of error and that, in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. DiltsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Nitschke v. BELLEQUECourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API