State v. Kendall
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
In a trial to the court, defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. We hold that the court did not err in denying that motion. However, we reverse because of the lack of a written waiver of trial by jury.
Consent to be tried without a jury requires an express written waiver. Or Const, Art I, § 11; ORS 136.001. Although the state concedes that there is no written waiver in the record, it argues that, because defendant did not object or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. SmayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.