Hawley v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Rehearing in Abstract 32693 (T. D. 33560).
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
In this case, bagging for cotton, classified by the collector of customs at the port of Galveston, Tex., as manufactures in chief value of flax, jute, and other vegetable fibers, was assessed for duty at 45 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 358 of the tariff act of 1909, which paragraph is as follows:
358. All woven articles, finished or unfinished, and all manufactures of flax, hemp, ramie, or other.vegetable fiber, or of which these substances, or any of them, is the component mateiial of chief value, not specially provided for in this section, forty-five per centum ad…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur's Executors v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Vantine v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Drew v. GrinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simiansky & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Westminster Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Varsity Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Buss v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Menchaca v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.