Legal Opinion

Simiansky & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 12, 1919No. 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 42978. [Oral argument Oct. 8, 1919, by Mr. Place and Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The appeal here relates to the classification of plain woven fabrics, referred to by the appraiser as “paddings” and so described by the Board of General Appraisers. The warp threads are single yarns •of cotton and the weft threads are single yarns of jute. These jute and cotton yarns constitute, respectively, about 60 and 40 per cent of the value of the fabric, the jute therefore being the' component material of chief value. The collector assessed duty at 35 per cent under paragraph 284 of the act of 1913 as a manufacture of vegetable fiber. The importers protested,, claiming free entry…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Accurate Millinery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. Palley Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Sheffler Merchandise Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  5. Sheffler Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API