Legal Opinion

Menchaca v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 2, 1965No. 69660; protest 321370-K (Laredo)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The merchandise involved herein consists of lithographed paper postcards bearing an embroidered design of rayon yarn superimposed thereon. Duty was assessed at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dee. 150, T.D. 54108, as articles in chief value of rayon, ornamented.

The ease was originally submitted for decision at Laredo, Tex., on a stipulation of facts by counsel. After plaintiff’s brief had been filed, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. United States v. Zinn & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Styson Art Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API