Legal Opinion

Buss v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 18, 1915No. 1518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7664 (T. D. 35064).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The articles now upon appeal are combination collar and cuff buttons having a metal shank and levers, with a base composed of metal covered with celluloid.

Duty was assessed upon the articles at the rate of 40 per cent ad valorem under the provision for “buttons not specially provided for” in paragraph 339, tariff act of 1913.

The importers protested, claiming assessment of the articles at 15 per cent ad valorem under the provision for “metal buttons” in páragraph 151 of the same act.

The protest was submitted to the Board of General Appraisers and was overruled. The importers now appeal.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Erhardt v. UllmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Charberjoy Distributors, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. Buss & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  4. B. Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API