Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Karn Et Ux v. Pidcock Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1960PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an appeal by the defendants Thomas Pidcock and Pearl A. Pidcock, husband and wife, from a decree ordering strict foreclosure of a contract and denying their request for rescission for alleged fraudulent representations.

The defendants Thomas Pidcock and Pearl A. Pidcock were the owners of certain farm and ranch property between Rainier and Clatskanie, Oregon.

The defendants Robert E. Sullivan and Marjorie Sullivan, husband and wife, were the owners of what was known as the Channel Apartments and a part of Block “A”, Breaker’s Addition to Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, Oregon.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Weiss and Hamilton v. GumbertOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Belanger v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Schlecht v. BlissOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Briscoe v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Costandi v. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Woods v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API